Why good user stories sometimes still lead to the wrong solution

The Power of User Stories. In Agile development, user stories are a widely used method for documenting requirements. They provide a simple framework for describing needs from the user’s perspective: “If …, I want … so that …”

The idea behind this is sound. By thinking from the user’s perspective, there is a greater focus on the value a solution must deliver. However, in practice, this doesn’t always work out that way.

What happens in practice

Although user stories are intended to document requirements, in practice they are often used to describe solutions.

For example: “As an HR manager, I’d like an export button so I can download absence data.”

At first glance, this seems like a clear user story. There is a user, a need, and a goal. Yet this story immediately raises a number of questions:

  • What is the user actually trying to achieve?
  • Why is this necessary?
  • What problem is the user trying to solve?
  • Is an export button really the solution to the problem?

In this case, the user story does not so much describe the need as it does a preconceived solution. This shifts the focus from understanding the problem to implementing functionality.

Perhaps the HR manager doesn’t want to download the data at all, but instead wants to report periodically to an external party. In that case, there may be better solutions, such as an automated report, a dashboard, or an integration with another system. Without that context, it’s difficult to determine which solution actually adds the most value.

From need to realization

User stories are often drafted based on discussions with stakeholders, during which the focus quickly shifts to what needs to be built. This is understandable, as stakeholders typically think in terms of solutions to the problems they encounter. As a result, the step involving the investigation and analysis of the problem sometimes receives less attention. The risk here is that solutions may seem logical but ultimately fail to contribute optimally to the objective.

At the same time, user stories play an important role within Agile teams. They form the basis for the backlog, support sprint planning, and help structure the work.

However, that is precisely where the risk lies. The focus can shift toward delivering user stories, when the ultimate goal should be to deliver value. After all, a team can successfully deliver all the stories, yet users may still encounter the same problems. Or functionality may be developed that is rarely used because the actual need was not sufficiently investigated.

The Importance of Analysis

This is where the Business and Information Analyst plays a key role.

The power of analysis lies not in describing a solution, but in understanding the problem. By asking probing questions about goals, pain points, processes, and underlying needs, we gain insight into what is really going on. Only once it is clear what problem needs to be solved and what value that will create can we determine which solution is most appropriate.

User stories can be a valuable tool in this process. Not as a substitute for analysis, but as a way to translate an analyzed problem into concrete development tasks. They add the most value when used:

  • As a tool to help structure the conversation
  • As an expression of an underlying need;
  • As part of a broader context of goals, processes, and stakeholders

In that situation, user stories help guide development without losing sight of the actual need.

Conclusion

User stories are a useful tool in Agile development. However, their value depends heavily on how they are used.

When user stories focus primarily on describing solutions, there is a risk that teams will implement functionality without first giving sufficient thought to the underlying problem. The focus then shifts from value creation to delivery.

The question, therefore, is not how well a user story is written, but how well the underlying problem is understood. After all, a perfect user story delivers no value if it solves the wrong problem. Perhaps, then, we should spend less time perfecting user stories and more time understanding the problems behind them.

Would you like to learn more about this topic? Please contactWendy Groven-Hogenboom, Business and Information Analyst at Valid.