How do you write good non-functional requirements?

The biggest problem with NFRs isn’t that they’re missing, but that they’re too vague. The trick is to make them concrete and measurable.

1. Make them measurable (SMART)

Avoid general terms such as:

  • “fast”
  • “safe”
  • “user-friendly”

And translate them into specific requirements:

  • “The response time is no more than 2 seconds with 1,000 concurrent users”
  • “The system complies with ISO 27001 and uses MFA”
  • “95% of users can perform a task without training within 3 minutes”

2. Use a consistent structure

A good NFR often follows this structure:

[Subject] + [criterion] + [measurement value] + [context]

For example:

This makes them immediately usable for both development and operations.

3. Link them to acceptance criteria

An NFR is only valuable if you can verify whether it has been met.

For example:

Without verification, these remain mere intentions rather than commitments.

4. Explicitly prioritize them

Not all NFRs are equally important. Make a distinction:

This helps when making decisions under time pressure.

5. Establish ownership

Who is responsible for:

Without a sense of ownership, NFRs often fade into the background during a project.

Why this makes a difference

The difference between successful and problematic projects often lies not in functionality, but in quality.

Organizations that incorporate NFRs early on and effectively:

In other words: you’re not just building a system that works, but one that’s ready for real-world use. Would you like to learn more, or do you need help drafting effective non-functional requirements?